Durability
ICFs
FAQ
Tilt-Up FAQ
Links
Concrete
Publications
Link to Us





|
Commercial ICFs
Wind Resistance
Concrete provides built-in safety.
Debris driven by high winds
presents the greatest hazard to buildings during tornadoes and
hurricanes. Recent laboratory testing at Texas Tech University's
Wind Engineering Research Center compared the impact resistance of
residential concrete wall construction to conventionally-framed
walls. The frame walls failed to stop the penetration of airborne
hazards, while the concrete walls successfully demonstrated the
strength and mass necessary to resist the impact of wind-driven
debris.
What was tested?
Various wall specimens were
subjected to the impact of a 2x4 wood stud traveling at up to 100
miles per hour. This is equivalent to the weight and speed of debris
generated during a tornado with 250 mile-per-hour winds. This
testing covers the maximum wind speed generated in 99 percent of the
tornadoes occurring in the United States. Wind speeds are less than
150 miles per hour in 90 percent of tornadoes.
Ten wall specimens were constructed, each representative of the type
of construction now used to build frame homes and concrete homes in
the U.S. Tables 1 and 2 describe each wall assembly tested.
The Wind Engineering Research Center used a compressed air cannon to
propel the wood stud debris "missile" at the test walls. The stud
was propelled along its axis with the leading end hitting the
specimen. Electronic timing devices measured the speed of the debris
as it traveled from the cannon to the test walls located 16’ to 6"
away.
How did the frame walls perform?
The frame walls lacked the weight
and mass to resist the impact of the wind-driven debris. In each
case, the debris traveled completely through the wall assembly with
little or no damage to the "missile."
Table 1: Frame Wall Test Results
|
Wall
Type |
Test
Wall Description |
Speed
of Debris |
Results |
|
Wood Frame |
⅝"
gypsum board interior finish,
2 x 4 wood studs at 16" o.c.,
3-½"
batt insulation,
¾"
plywood sheathing,
vinyl siding exterior finish. |
109.0 mph |
The debris
missile perforated completely through the wall assembly.
Little damage to missile. |
|
Wood Frame |
⅝"
gypsum board interior finish,
2 x 4 wood
studs at 16" o.c.,
3-½"
batt insulation,
¾"
plywood sheathing,
4" brick veneer with 1" air space. |
69.4 mph |
The debris
missile perforated completely through the brick veneer
and the interior finish. Minor damage to missile. |
|
Steel Frame |
⅝"
gypsum board interior finish,
steel studs at
16" o.c.,
3-½"
batt insulation,
¾"
plywood sheathing,
vinyl siding exterior finish. |
103.5 mph |
The debris
missile perforated completely through the wall
assembly. Little damage to missile. |
|
Steel Frame |
⅝"
gypsum board interior finish,
2 x 4 wood studs at 16" o.c.,
3-½"
batt insulation,
⅝"
gypsum board sheathing,
synthetic stucco exterior finish. |
50.9 mph |
The debris
missile perforated completely through the wall
assembly. No damage to missile. |
How did
the concrete walls perform?
The concrete stopped the debris
from traveling through the wall. Exterior finishes were damaged by
the impact, but the concrete walls themselves remained unscathed.
Even the narrowest, 2" thick section of "waffle grid" ICF wall was
undamaged by the direct impact of the debris at over 100 mph.
Table 2: Concrete Wall Test Results
|
Wall Type
|
Test Wall
Description |
Speed of Debris
|
Results |
|
Concrete |
6" thick reinforced
concrete wall, #4 vert. reinforcing bars, 12" o.c.,
no finishes. |
109.0 mph |
No cracking, front face
scabbing, or back face spalling of concrete
observed. |
|
Concrete |
6" thick reinforced
concrete wall, #4 vert. reinforcing bars, 24" o.c.,
no finishes. |
102.4 mph |
No cracking, front face
scabbing, or back face spalling of concrete
observed. |
|
ICF |
Block ICF foam forms,
6" thick flat concrete wall,
#4 vert. reinforcing bars, 12" o.c., vinyl siding.
(Tested a second time with similar results)
|
103.8 mph |
Debris penetrated vinyl
siding and foam form. No cracking, front face
scabbing, or back face spalling of concrete wall
observed. |
|
ICF |
Block ICF foam forms,
6" thick flat concrete wall,
#4 vert. reinforcing bars, 24" o.c., 3" brick veneer
with ties spaced 1'-0"
each way. |
99.0 mph |
Debris penetrated and
cracked brick veneer. Foam form dented. No
cracking, front face scabbing, or back face spalling
of concrete wall observed. |
|
ICF |
Panel ICF foam forms,
4" thick flat concrete wall,
#4 vert. reinforcing bars, 24" o.c., vinyl siding. |
96.7 mph |
Debris penetrated vinyl
siding and foam form. No cracking, front face
scabbing, or back face spalling of concrete wall
observed. |
|
ICF |
Block ICF foam forms,
variable thickness "waffle" concrete wall,
6" max. 2" min.
thickness,
#4 vert. reinforcing bars in each 6" vertical core
at 24" o.c., synthetic stucco finish(Tested a second time with similar results).
|
100.2 mph |
Debris penetrated
synthetic stucco finish and foam form. Impact on
wall at 2" thick section. No cracking, front face
scabbing, or back face spalling of concrete wall
observed. |
|
|
Note: All concrete
tested: 3000 PSI compressive strength, maximum aggregate
size ¾", 6" slump. |
What about damage from hurricanes?
Hurricane wind velocities would be less than the equivalent maximum
speeds modeled in these tests. Missile testing designed to mitigate
property damage losses from hurricanes uses a 9-pound missile
traveling about 34 mph as criterion.
What's the bottom line?
The strength and durability of concrete walls formed with ICFs offer
unmatched resistance to the devastation of major storms. Concrete
buildings are less likely to suffer major damage from debris than
conventionally-framed structures. This greater measure of built-in
safety makes ICF construction the quality choice for your building.
More Information?
The following publication and
video are available from the Portland Cement Association:
•
VC511 "Concrete Homes:
Built-In Safety" ($4.95)
Videotape documenting the results of the wind-driven debris impact
testing. All
ten of the impact tests are
featured.
•
RP122 "Investigation of Wind
Projectile Resistance of ICF Homes" (June 1998)
Written report with photos detailing the results of the wind-driven
debris impact
research. Background
information on the critter and assumptions used to
generate the test design
are included.
To order, call PCA Publications at
1-800-868-6733. |

ConcreteAnswers for Architects, Engineers and
Developers:
Concrete
Answers.org
ConcreteParking.org
Pervious
Pavement.org
GreenConcrete.info
FlowableFill.org
SelfConsolidating
Concrete.org
GreenRoofTops.org



|