Durability
ICFs
FAQ
Tilt-Up FAQ
Links
Concrete
Publications
Link to Us





|
Commercial ICFs
Save Energy, Save
Money!
Concrete
buildings save energy.
Building a concrete
structure with insulating concrete forms (ICFs) saves energy
and money. The greater insulation, tighter construction, and
temperature-smoothing mass of the walls conserve heating and
cooling energy much better than conventional wood-frame
walls. This reduces monthly fuel bills. It also allows the
use of smaller heating and cooling equipment, saving money
in construction.
How
much will I save?
Buildings constructed
with ICF exterior walls require an estimated 44% less energy
to heat and 32% less energy to cool than comparable frame
structures. A typical 2000 square foot building in the
center of the U.S. will save approximately $200 in heating
costs and $65 in air conditioning each year.
The bigger the building, the bigger the savings. In colder
areas of the U.S. and Canada, heating savings will be more
and cooling savings less. In hotter areas, heating savings
will be less and cooling savings more.
|
Estimated Annual Heating Savings

Estimated Annual Cooling Savings

|
The smaller heating and cooling
equipment needed for such an energy-efficient building can
cut construction costs by an estimated $500 to $2000. The
biggest equipment savings come with the buildings that have
the most energy savings.
How do
we know all this?
The energy savings
estimates come from a study of single-family houses spread
across the U.S. and Canada. Researchers gathered data on 58
houses in all. Half had exterior walls constructed with
concrete using ICFs made of expanded polystyrene (EPS) or
extruded polystyrene (XPS) foam. The other half were
neighboring houses with walls constructed of wood frame. All
houses were relatively new (less than 6 years old) and built
with modern methods.
The researchers compared the energy bill of each concrete
house to its frame counterpart, carefully correcting for
important differences to get an “apples-to-apples”
comparison. Estimates of equipment savings are actual
numbers reported by contractors that build ICF houses.
Where
do the savings come from?
Insulating values for ICF
walls using polystyrene foam are R-17 to R-26, compared to
wood frame’s R-9 to R-15. So ICF walls are expected to cut
the conduction losses through foundation and above-grade
walls by about half. And ICF walls are tighter. In tests,
ICF houses averaged about 1/2 as much infiltration (air
leakage) as frame.
|
Sources of Energy Loss

Energy Loss Reduction

|
ICF walls do more than cut down
on the biggest types of energy loss. The concrete gives them
the heat-absorbing property, “thermal mass”. This is the
ability to smooth out large swings in temperature. It keeps
the walls of the building warmer when the outdoor
temperature hits its coldest extreme, and keeps them cooler
when the outdoor temperature is hottest. The walls
themselves “add back” heat or cooling to the building when
it needs them most. This contributes about 6% of the
structure's required energy for free.
Reduced equipment costs result from the energy savings.
Since the energy needed is less, the furnaces and
compressors that heat and cool can be smaller. And the more
the energy savings, the greater the possible reduction in
equipment size-- and the equipment cost.
What's
the bottom line?
In planning a building,
you can estimate that choosing concrete walls made of ICFs
will save you hundreds of dollars per year in energy costs.
As shown in the graphs, the savings are greater the bigger
the building is. Heating savings are highest in cold
climates, and cooling savings highest in warm climates.
You may also save hundreds or thousands of dollars in
construction costs for heating and cooling equipment. Talk
with an ICF supplier or contractor for estimates. |

ConcreteAnswers for Architects, Engineers and
Developers:
Concrete
Answers.org
ConcreteParking.org
Pervious
Pavement.org
GreenConcrete.info
FlowableFill.org
SelfConsolidating
Concrete.org
GreenRoofTops.org



|